Hong Kong Influencer Faces Fraud Charges in Massive Virtual Asset Scheme

A prominent Hong Kong personality, Joseph Lam, appeared in Eastern Magistrates’ Courts this morning amidst the ongoing legal fallout from the substantial JPEX virtual asset platform investigation. Lam is among 16 individuals, including several social media influencers, charged in connection with the alleged scheme, which authorities assert has impacted at least 2,709 victims with reported losses of approximately HK$1.6 billion. The appearance marks a significant step in the high-profile case involving allegations of financial misconduct in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Lam’s bail was set at HK$300,000, subject to stringent conditions, including surrendering all travel documents, a prohibition on departing Hong Kong, and mandatory daily reporting to law enforcement. His case is slated for transfer and hearing at the High Court on December 15. The investigation has drawn extensive public scrutiny, particularly concerning the role of public figures who promoted the now-defunct platform.

The Wide-Reaching Allegations

Police confirmed that as of a recent update, they have recorded over 2,709 complaints, with the combined alleged losses reaching the region of HK$1.6 billion. The extensive probe has resulted in 80 arrests to date. Among the 16 formally charged, attention has centered on well-known promotional figures like Lam, Chan Wing-yee, and Leung Yee-sheung, alongside several other business and tech personalities associated with the crypto venture.

Lam is one of eight defendants named in a related charge sheet, collectively facing 33 charges. These serious allegations include conspiracy to defraud, inducing investments in virtual assets through fraudulent or reckless misrepresentation, and money laundering.

Specifically, prosecutors allege that Lam committed fraud between July 8 and September 12, 2023, by making misleading or false assertions designed to encourage investment. These purported claims included stating that JPEX held necessary licenses in multiple jurisdictions, that platform withdrawals were reliable, that he possessed non-public information about the platform, and that specific virtual asset investments guaranteed fixed percentage returns. The prosecution argues these assertions induced investors to trade, leading to their losses and financial gain for Lam.

Court Proceedings and Defendant Status

Represented by Senior Counsel Cheng Huan, Lam entered the court wearing subdued attire. While his girlfriend, Hiromi Wada, was present in the public gallery, Lam reportedly appeared tired, acknowledging the interpreter’s reading of the fraud charge with a simple “understood.”

One co-defendant, Cheng Chun-hei (31), had his bail application refused by the magistrate. Conversely, the court granted bail to Lam, Chan Wing-yee, and five other defendants, though the remaining five had lower bail amounts ranging from HK$50,000 to HK$100,000. All were given strict conditions, including restrictions on contacting prosecution witnesses.

Despite the serious legal implications, Lam was reportedly defiant upon leaving court, striking a confident tone and making a surprising comment to media that his cell was “more comfortable than home.” He later informed local media that he was not worried and was consulting his legal team about organizing a press conference to address public concerns directly. Lam insisted he was not the most culpable party in the alleged scheme and welcomed scrutiny.

Next Steps for the Defendants

Authorities have noted that while Lam’s group of eight is proceeding together, the cases against the other eight defendants involved in the overall JPEX investigation are moving separately. One case has already been transferred to the District Court, underscoring the fragmented but widespread nature of this significant financial investigation.

The legal journey for Lam and the other defendants continues as the case against the unlicensed virtual asset trading platform moves toward the High Court, focusing public attention on the responsibilities of online promoters and the need for rigorous consumer protection in the virtual asset market.